Shared document review is not finished until comments, tracked changes, and version names agree

A shared document review is not finished when the last person says “looks good.” It is finished when the visible state of the document matches the decision the team intends to use.

In Word, tracked changes have to be accepted or rejected before the markup disappears as a final document state. In Google Docs, version history and named versions can help a team identify which version matters. In Slack canvas or a similar team note surface, meeting notes and tasks may sit near the conversation where work happens. Each tool has a different review surface, but the operational problem is the same: readers need to know which text is current.

A clean review handoff should answer five questions. Which version is final? Which comments are still open? Which suggested edits were accepted or rejected? Who owns the next edit? Where will the approved copy be reused? If any answer is missing, the next reader may make a decision from stale markup.

The cleanup does not need to erase useful history. Some comments explain legal, customer, or design reasoning and should be moved into a decision note or source section before being resolved. Other comments are only drafting noise and should not remain in the final copy. The key is to separate evidence from clutter.

For recurring documents, use an explicit final marker such as “Approved for customer reply on 2026-06-25” or “Ready for onboarding page.” That phrase gives future readers a safer anchor than a vague file name like final-v3. The review is done when the document, comments, and version name tell the same story.

Shared document review is not finished until comments, tracked changes, and version names agree

// COMMENTS

ON THIS PAGE