Geothermal Energy: Why the Heat Under Our Feet Is Finally Getting a Second Look

About 6,000 kilometers beneath where you're sitting, Earth's inner core sits at approximately 5,200°C — roughly the surface temperature of the Sun. That heat doesn't stay down there. It conducts outward through the mantle and crust continuously, supplemented by the radioactive decay of isotopes like uranium-238, thorium-232, and potassium-40 scattered through the rock. Earth's total geothermal heat flow is estimated at around 47 terawatts — comparable to global human energy consumption.

Almost none of it is currently being used.

The reason for that gap, and why it may be closing faster than most people realize, is an engineering story that connects oil drilling technology, electricity grid economics, and a Google office park in Nevada.

## Where Earth's Heat Comes From

The intuitive answer — "the Earth formed hot and hasn't cooled yet" — is half right. About 40–50% of Earth's internal heat is **primordial**: left over from the accretion of the planet and the giant impact that formed the Moon about 4.5 billion years ago. The rest comes from the ongoing radioactive decay of long-lived isotopes in the crust and mantle. These two sources have been in rough balance long enough that Earth maintains a stable interior temperature, losing heat to space slightly faster than radioactive decay replenishes it.

The heat flow to the surface isn't uniform. Mid-ocean ridges, volcanic hotspots (Iceland, Hawaii, Yellowstone), and subduction zones bring heat much closer to the surface. These are the regions where **hydrothermal geothermal** power has been exploited for over a century: steam or hot water naturally rises through permeable rock, can be tapped by drilling relatively shallow wells, and used to drive turbines.

Iceland generates around 30% of its electricity and nearly all of its space heating from geothermal. Kenya gets about 50% of its grid electricity from the Olkaria geothermal field in the Rift Valley. New Zealand, the Philippines, and parts of California and Nevada have significant geothermal capacity. But all of these are regions with naturally convenient geology — places where the hot rock happens to be close to the surface and where natural water circulates through it.

Most of the world doesn't have that geology.

## Enhanced Geothermal Systems: The Hard Part

Below almost every point on Earth's surface, if you drill deep enough, you will eventually reach rock that is hot enough to generate electricity — typically above 150–200°C. The problem is that in most places, you have to drill 3–10 kilometers to reach those temperatures, and the rock you find there is typically **dry and impermeable**. Without natural water circulating through it, there's no way to extract the heat conventionally.

**Enhanced Geothermal Systems** (EGS) are an attempt to solve this by engineering the geology artificially. The concept is straightforward: drill down to hot dry rock, inject water under high pressure to fracture the rock and create permeability, then pump water through this engineered reservoir, collect it as steam at a second well, and run it through a turbine. The water is recycled in a closed loop.

The concept has been understood since the 1970s. The first major EGS demonstration project, at Fenton Hill, New Mexico, ran from 1974 to 1992 and proved the basic principle. But scaling it up commercially proved far harder than anticipated. The main obstacles were:

- **Induced seismicity**: High-pressure fluid injection into rock can trigger earthquakes, sometimes large enough to cause concern. A 2009 EGS project in Basel, Switzerland, was shut down after a 3.4-magnitude earthquake. This problem is manageable with careful monitoring and pressure control — but it killed early commercial confidence.
- **Drilling costs**: Deep hard-rock drilling in hot, highly stressed rock was expensive and slow. The drill bits and casings developed for oil and gas wells weren't optimized for geothermal conditions.
- **Uncertainty**: The fracture network created by pressurization is difficult to predict and control, making project economics uncertain.

What changed is that the oil and gas industry, over the past two decades, has made dramatic advances in directional drilling and reservoir engineering through the shale revolution. These technologies translate directly to EGS development. Drill bits that can handle hard deep rock, sensors that image underground fracture networks in real time, and computer models that optimize well placement — all of this has gotten significantly better and cheaper.

> 🔬 **Quick experiment:** Fill a glass jar with sand and pour in a small amount of water. Watch how it distributes unevenly. Now squeeze the jar gently (don't actually do this with a glass jar — just imagine it). The water would be forced into new pathways. That's approximately what hydraulic fracturing does to rock: it uses fluid pressure to open or create cracks, creating permeability where none existed before.

## Fervo Energy and the Google Deal

The clearest evidence that EGS is becoming commercially viable came in 2023–2024, when Fervo Energy began delivering geothermal power to the Nevada grid under a long-term agreement with **Google**. Google had purchased the power as part of its commitment to 24/7 carbon-free electricity — meaning not just that they use renewable energy on average, but that they have clean power available at every hour of the day.

This is the key distinction. Solar generates power only when the sun shines. Wind is intermittent. The grid needs **baseload renewable power** — generation that runs continuously regardless of weather — to decarbonize fully. Geothermal power has a capacity factor typically above 90% (it runs almost all the time), making it fundamentally different in grid value from solar or wind.

Fervo's project used horizontal drilling techniques borrowed directly from oil and gas: two horizontal wells drilled about a kilometer apart through the same hot rock formation, with a connection created by pressurization. The arrangement dramatically increases the contact area between injected water and hot rock compared to vertical wells, improving heat extraction efficiency.

Early data from the project showed power output and efficiency exceeding initial projections. Fervo has since announced further projects and attracted significant venture funding. Several other companies — including Quaise Energy (using millimeter-wave energy to vaporize rock instead of drilling through it) and Eavor (using closed-loop "rads" without hydraulic fracturing) — are pursuing different approaches to the same problem.

## The Economics and What Comes Next

The fundamental economic challenge of EGS is that the technology is capital-intensive upfront and the resource is essentially infinite. Once a well is drilled and a reservoir established, the fuel is free and inexhaustible. This is attractive for long-term energy planning but requires patient capital that prefers predictable returns over decades — a different risk profile from a gas turbine that can be built quickly and fueled from the market.

The US Department of Energy's "Enhanced Geothermal Shot" initiative targets a 90% cost reduction in EGS by 2035. The International Energy Agency has projected that geothermal could provide up to 3.5% of global electricity by 2050 under aggressive development scenarios — a small share, but significant for a source that provides firm, baseload power that other renewables cannot.

The heat under our feet has always been there. The question was never whether it could be used — it was whether we could build the tools to reach it. For the first time in geothermal's history, those tools are arriving.

Geothermal Energy: Why the Heat Under Our Feet Is Finally Getting a Second Look

// COMMENTS

ON THIS PAGE