What should stay open-editable in team docs?

A practical question about low-risk edits versus owner-reviewed changes in shared team documentation.

For shared docs, I would let anyone fix typos, broken links, examples, screenshots, and obvious clarifications. Owner review should start when the edit changes responsibility, customer promise, approval criteria, access rules, or the sequence people follow. Does that split cover most team documentation cases, or is there another category that needs explicit handling?