Do you separate published date, last updated date, and checked date in summaries?

A source freshness question about keeping publication date, visible update date, and summary check date separate.

I prefer summaries that keep three dates separate: published date, visible last-updated date, and the date the summarizer checked the source. They answer different questions. Published date says when the record began, last updated says whether the page changed, and checked date says when the summary was verified. For guidance pages, API docs, legal sources, and standards errata, merging those dates can make a summary look more current than it is. How do you mark freshness without making every citation too heavy?